Thursday 5 April 2018

Kim Jong Un’s visit to China: A diplomatic master stroke


North Korean President Kim Jong Un’s sudden visit to China has surprised strategists World over. The visit which comes days after US President Trump and North Korean leader Kim have agreed for a one on one meeting in May. Strategists who anticipated a rendezvous between two unpredictable honchos, Kim-Trump, would create a rift in North Korea and China alliance and Beijing’s consequent isolation were flabbergasted by this unplanned visit. The Kim-Trump Summit which was expected to force North Korea into giving up nuclear option under pressure now seems a far-fetched idea.

North Korea, under Kim Jong Un, become an embodiment of uncertainty started showing signs of change of tack since the beginning of 2018. The country which has severed ties with almost all countries displayed signs of amiability and rapprochement. In February, Kim Jong’s sister travelled to South Korea along with official North Korean delegation to attend the opening ceremony of winter Olympics signaling a marked departure from Kim’s ostensible bellicosity. Aside cheering unified Korean hockey team, North Korean delegation carried an invitation from Kim to South Korean President to visit their country and expressed willingness for talks. Though Moon, didn’t accept the invitation immediately, Kim’s change in approach has raised hopes of peace returning to the region threatened by nuclear ambitions of Kim. Within a fortnight, South Korean delegation visited Kim who offered to suspend nuclear and ballistic tests.

South Korean officials later handed over Kim’s invitation for talks to President Trump paving way for Kim-Trump summit meet in May. It was also agreed that Kim would meet President Moon in April. While these propitious developments added fresh impetus towards denuclearization of the Korean the possibility of Kim meeting President Xi before all his official bilateral talks was unexpected. Peace eluded this region ever since Kim put North Korea on the path of uninterrupted nuclear and missile testing. Despite renewed economic sanctions and massive international campaigning against the tyrannical regime of Kim, North Korea refused to bow down.  North Korean economy stayed afloat by virtue of bilateral trade with its biggest trading partner and iron-brother China.

Notwithstanding UNSC sanctions, China for long continued to trade with North Korea which nearly met 90% met of Pyongyang’s requirements. China turned blind eye to massive black-marketing flourishing along the China-Korea border and even failed to plug the financial conduits operating from its territory despite US’s repeated requests. But when Kim tried to override China and attempted to build direct parleys with US, China froze petroleum exports to North Korea bringing Pyongyang to its knees. The extent of cuts imposed by China were to a tune of 89%. Financial Times, in article illustrates that cuts are now 90% compared to last years on petroleum and extended them to exports of Coal, steel, motor vehicles. Ruffled by Kim’s diplomatic flurry, China wanted to remind Pyongyang of its economic leverage forcing it to come to the negotiating table. China simply doesn’t want to miss the chance of playing a crucial role in resolving the crisis in the region which has rattled countries like Japan and South Korea, both allies of US. Kim’s nuclear ambitions irked its allies China and Russia, to say the least.

Like Pakistan, North Korea had iron-brother friendship with China. Huge numbers of Chinese troops fought for North Korea during the Korean war in 1950 against the US. Referring to friendship between China and North Korea, Mao Zedong, said, the two countries are like “lips and teeth”. DPRK’s path to nuclear weapon obsession can be traced back to 1953, Armistice of Korean war which left a deep impression on North Korean leader, Kim Il Sung who believed nuclear weapon accumulation alone deter American aggression. DPRK’s animosity towards America stems from the fact that US emerged as a big obstacle for unification of both Koreas. Soon, a determined DPRK partnered with, its ideological compatriot Soviet Union for developing weapons. By 1963 when countries were lining up the Nuclear Non-Proliferation Treaty, North Korea refused to sign and kept its nuclear options open. Seeking Soviet Union’s help DPRK developed a small nuclear reactor by 1965. US invasion of Vietnam in 1969 prompted North Korea to steadily hold on to the path of developing nuclear technology. North Korea, sandwiched between the two Communist logger heads, had on and off cordial relations with both the giants. Despite receiving help from China and Soviet Union, DPRK rarely acknowledged their support.

Following China’s military assistance at the height of Korean war, DPRK maintained close relations with the big brother. Between 1953-60, DPRK had warm relations with China which extend military aid. Sino-Russian conflict eventually changed this equation. In 1960s during the Sino-Soviet conflict, Soviet Union forced DPRK to side with it in return for greater military aid. But slowly the aid began to taper under Gorbachev and relations worsened after the fall of Soviet Union when Boris Yeltsin refused to provide support to DPRK and favored South Korea instead. Bilateral ties received a new fillip when President Putin and Kim Jong-il signed Treaty on Friendship, Good neighborly relations and cooperation in 2000. But bilateral ties suffered a new hit after Russia joined China, US, UK, France, Japan and South Korea for initiating sanctions against DPRK following its first nuclear test in 2006. Unlike other countries, Russia and China never supported use of force against DPRK since they had porous borders with DPRK. DPRK tried to maintain good relations with Russia and continued to engage with it for the fear of total global ostracization and successfully concluded border treaty with Russia in 2012. But the latest nuclear tests in 2016 irked Russia who categorically supported imposition of fresh round of sanctions on DPRK.

DPRK’s relations with China varied from being congenial to baited suspicion. In 1956, pro-China fractions in DPRK, attempted to throw away Kim Il Sung from power. This incident created fears of Chinese interference in DPRK. But later in 1961 DPRK signed Sino-North Korean Mutual Aid and Cooperation Friendship Treaty mandating China to render military assistance in case of an foreign attack on DPRK. The treaty was extended twice in 1981 and 2001 and is valid till 2021. By mid 1960s bilateral ties with China moved south with DPRK deriding Mao’s Cultural Revolution. Despite occasions of fractures in relationship, China tried to put up with DPRK’s tantrums as Pyongyang was pivotal for its strategic interests. China feared the prospect of huge exodus of North Korean refugees entering its territory. Hence post-Korean war, China donated funds to DPRK for reconstruction and economic development of DPRK. Also, with thousands of American troops stationed in South Korea, China was perennially wary of a plausible American aggression and spread of American influence in the region. Sino-DPRK relations turned tumultuous when China established diplomatic relations with South Korea in 1992. Angered DPRK again turned back to Russia, but in vain. In course of its existence as Democratic People’s Republic of Korea (DPRK), Korea always played Russian card with China and vice-versa. It oscillated back and forth shifting its allegiances between the two countries. It meticulously enacted several tricks to stay afloat with dreams firmly fixed on making itself a nuclear state capable of defending itself against any external aggression. DPRK has mastered brinkmanship and smart diplomacy for its existence. Alternatively, even China and Russia have employed economic coercion to contain the belligerent attitude of DPRK. In 2017, when China tightened exports to Pyongyang, it turned to Russia grudgingly and named it as its major international ally. But currently, with Russia facing severe international censure over alleged chemical usage on Russia spy Sergei Skripal and China determined to bring DPRK to knees, Kim has exhausted all his options.  

The Korean crisis potentially disrupted the peace and security of the North East Asia directly affecting the national interests of six parties-both Koreas, Japan, China, Russia, and United States. Of these six countries, China and DPRK have been drawing greater mileage out this crisis. Owing to its greater economic and strategic leverage over DPRK, China’s besides partially tightening sanctions, resorted to inordinate bargaining with US and Japan. Threatened by DPRK’s nuclear escalation, Japan tacitly agreed to support OBOR. China eventually had a way with America. China slowly began to have an upper hand over despotic Kim. Smart, brutish Kim, instead of buckling under Chinese pressure, having accumulated sufficient nuclear arsenal, determinedly reached out South Korea to rescue it economy from near total financial bankruptcy. Prudently, Kim reached out to US through South Korea and sought American nod for a summit meeting. To assure the West of DPRK’s keenness for a diplomatic solution for resolving Korean crisis, Kim made his first diplomatic move.

Kim’s trip to China, his first state visit to a foreign country since assuming reigns of the country in 2011 is thus a master stroke. The move no less than an appeasement hasn’t reduced the prominence of China at the negotiation table but earned Kim an invitation from South Korea and Japan for talks.  Upon meeting President Xi, Kim effusively praised him saying that he was “greatly encouraged and inspired by his views” , struck a positive note and ensured China got the honor of being the peacemaker. Xinhua news reports that Kim said, “It is our consistent stand to be committed to denuclearization on the peninsula, in accordance with the will of late President Kim Sung Il and late general secretary Kim Jong-Il. The issue of denuclearization of the Korean peninsula can be resolved, if South Korea and the United States respond to our efforts with good will, create an atmosphere of peace and stability while taking progressive and synchronous measures for realization of peace”. Kim also extracted public affirmation from Xi that “no matter how the international and regional situation changes” China would continue to maintain strong relations with DPRK.

To make best out the whole situation, despite Xi’s intense dislike for Kim, China extended red carpet welcome, ensured tight security and secrecy, made the details of the trip public only after Kim left Beijing as agreed earlier. Much ahead of the uphill task of peace negotiations with President Trump, Kim wooed China. Beijing will now be hard pressed to support DPRK. It is now obligated not to adopt a harsh stance and stifle DPRK by tightening flow of essential supplies. By resetting ties with China, Kim strengthened his position and speeded up chances of restoration of peace in Korean peninsula without forgoing his strategic autonomy.


@ Copyrights reserved.

No comments: