Sunday 4 September 2016

China’s contemptible appeasement of India


Chinese Foreign Minister Wang Yi was on a three-day long visit to India last weekend to carry out strategic deliberations with India to ensure India’s support for its stance on the South China Sea. Wang’s agenda also included firming up President Xi Jinping’s trip to India to attend 8th BRICS Summit Meet at Goa and preparing draft of the joint statement for bilateral talks at G-20 Summit. He also prepared ground for talks on several crucial issues as leaders from both countries are all set to meet each other in their respective countries. Modi is scheduled to fly to China for the 11th G-20 summit meeting at Hangzhou, capital city of Zhejiang province from Sept 4-5th. Modi will be holding talks with President Xi along the sidelines of G-20 summit. Later Modi will embark on a bilateral visit to Vietnam and Laos to attend the 11th East Asia Summit (EAS) Meet. Wang after landing in Delhi had a brief sojourn to Goa to oversee preparations for the upcoming BRICS summit and met Goa Governor. Back in Delhi he had a dialogue with Prime Minister Narendra Modi and three hour-long talk with Sushma Swaraj.

China for the first time was handed the baton of Presidency of G-20 Summit at Brisbane in 2014 to conduct the summit meeting. To showcase its status as the emerging superpower, China invested over $100 billion to build state-of-art infrastructure facilities at Hangzhou, capital city of Zhejiang province for the summit. As Beijing aspires to revel in the new role of a “responsible power”, it sent Foreign Minister to India to reach at a consensus, seek each other support for the upcoming G-20 Summit Meet and the BRICS Meet to be held at Goa from October 4-5.

Of late, China crusading through the path of resurrection and aggrandizing economic embellishments began proactively engaging with various countries at international fora. To strengthen its regional grandstanding China worked towards establishment of alternative multilateral institutions like the New Development Bank through BRICS, Asian Infrastructure and Investment Bank (AIIB) and unveiled ambitious One Belt, One Road (OBOR). Communist Party of China (CPC) which is steadily losing ground for its dictatorial onslaughts, economic slowdown and widening income parities aspires to reassert its legitimacy by hosting G-20 summit.

China’s infamous notoriety for openly condemning the July 12th verdict of Permanent court of Arbitration, Hague which rejected the legal validity of its claims to the territorial regions in the South China Sea (SCS) drew international attention. Its defiance drew the ire of the West, Japan and others. Amidst the worst international face-off, China managed to coerce its financial benefactors into silence, created a rift among the ASEAN countries and scuttled their attempts to discuss SCS verdict at the recently concluded ASEAN summit at Laos. To its credit, China claims to have garnered support of 60 odd countries (including India). Indeed Beijing perspicaciously hinted to have obtained India’s support by drawing attention to the joint statement signed by foreign ministers of Russia, China and India at RIC, April 2016 that “All maritime disputes should be addressed through negotiations and agreements between the parties concerned”. Countering Beijing’s duplicitous interpretations, in its boilerplate response to the SCS verdict MEA said, “As a State Party to UNCLOS, India urges all parties to show utmost respect for the UNCLOS, which established international legal order of the seas and oceans”.

Indeed, India always favored freedom of navigation. The India-US Joint Strategic Vision for the Asia-Pacific and Indian Ocean Region of 2015 issued with President Obama indicated that “We (India and US) affirm the importance of safeguarding maritime security and ensuring freedom of navigation and over flight throughout the region, especially in the South China Sea”. India has even backed Philippines position in SCS, and at Indo-Philippines third joint commission meeting on bilateral affairs, the joint statement referred SCS as West Philippine Sea asserting its indirect support for peaceful resolution of SCS dispute.

China’s open defiance of SCS verdict has become bone of contention and in every likelihood western countries might raise the issue at G-20 Summit. India’s commitment towards freedom of navigation and commerce which is in line with US can spell trouble for China. Hence Wang Yi rushed to New Delhi to extract a promise of not siding with the West on the SCS issue. In fact Wang’s visit was preceded by subtle warning to India from the mouth piece of Chinese government, Global Times of potential danger in disruption of bilateral ties, business investments and trade if New Delhi fails to endorse Chinese position on SCS or talks about SCS at G-20 summit. In a veiled attempt it cautioned India of muddling the BRICS Meet if India fails to concede. Moreover, China, greatly disconcerted by ASEAN countries perception of India as the new regional challenger to Beijing’s territorial claims and deepening Indo-Vietnam cooperation has made Beijing wary of India.

But currently relations between two Asian giants are mired by several outstanding issues. India was ruffled by reports of PLA’s (Peoples Liberation Army) incursions and air space violations into Uttarakhand’s Chamoli district, joint Sino-Pakistan military patrols in the POK and clandestine build-up of military logistics in the disputed POK region. New Delhi is also miffed by China’s comments on Kashmir issue and its ineptness in prevailing over the cross-border terrorism perpetrated by Pakistan. India is visibly irked by Chinese indulgence in CPEC. Unrestrained flow of sophisticated defence technology from China has emboldened Pakistan’s anti-India terror agenda. China in turn condemned Indian media for “stirring up” negative sentiments and was upset over denial of extension of visa’s to  three Chinese media personnel. Indo-Chinese relations hit a major stand-off with China unwilling to relent India’s candidature for NSG. China played an obstructionist by obstinately insisting that India should be a signatory of NPT to become member of NSG. It is worth noting that Beijing supported for a waiver to India proposed by US in 2008 without a whimper. China at the recent Seoul Plenary of NSG argued that any waivers extended to India should as well be passed on the other aspirants like Pakistan. In the meanwhile, India’s NSG membership received a shot in arm with Mexico publicly stating that NSG membership and NPT shouldn’t be clubbed together since ratification of NPT is only one of the five clauses for getting into nuclear club. With China keen on appeasing India in return for its silence on SCS verdict at G-20, offered to resume talks about India’s candidature for NSG. While Wang was eager to cover major ground on getting India’s endorsement for SCS, setting aside India’s concerns, Swaraj firmly deliberated on China’s blocking of India’s candidature to NSG and its vetoing India’s move to impose ban on JeM Chief Masood Azhar at UN.

Over the decades, terms of engagement between India and China witnessed sudden shift. Both countries resolved to keep contentious border disputes on a back burner and agreed to strengthen cooperation on issues of common concern at several international platforms. Subsequently, they have rejuvenated business ties wherein economic returns majorly tilted in favor of China. But lately relations are taking a new turn with India emerging a favorite destination for investment. Sustained growth patterns has changed fortunes of India and with countries like US and Japan  forging strategic ties with New Delhi, India is increasingly viewed as a “potential regional rival” by China. Wang’s visit to India is perceived to an attempt to ensure India’s support and cooperation at G-20 Summit. To avert possible embarrassment, China has shifting its position from premonitory admonition to potential appeasement or rather adopted a carrot and stick approach to put a lid on simmering bilateral ties. Indeed, a great power differential exists between India and China and conventional wisdom dictates India to be sensitive to vital interests of bigger power. But given, China’s persistent reluctance to support India’s permanent membership to UNSC, unrelenting stance on NSG membership and thwarting attempts on terror outfits India is forced to rethink its strategies. While Beijing agreed to setup formal high level talks to discuss outstanding issues including India’s NSG membership, it warned of plausible disruption in bilateral business ties if India refrains from remaining silent on SCS at G-20 summit. Hence, despite China’s “carrot and stick” kind of approach Indian leadership must remain affirmative, for 55% of India’s seaborne trade passes through SCS. 
 
@ Copyrights reserved

 

No comments: