A pall of gloom has descended on the nation. The Pahalgam terror attack has shaken the nation, lulled into complacency of ‘sab changa si’. The targeted attack on Hindus is reminiscent of the Chittisinghapura attack of 2000 during President Bill Clinton’s India visit, in which 36 Sikhs were killed. Incidentally, the Pahalgam attack that killed 26 Hindus coincided with the ongoing US Vice President J.D. Vance’s India tour. Apart from the geopolitical signalling, what has struck the collective conscience is the selectivity of the attack and a potent threat to Hindus living in their own motherland.
Hindus were singled out, identified, forced to recite Kalima
and then killed in cold blood. From the earliest Islamist invasions of the 8th
century till the dastardly Pahalgam terrorist attack, the template hasn’t
changed. Script and intent remaining the same, advanced military weapons
replaced the razor-sharp swords of medieval times. After confirming the
religious identity of individuals, bullets were pumped into their chests of the
tourists holidaying in Kashmir for “not being Muslim”.
While the pattern is not new, every targeted terror attack, braying
for Hindu blood, descends the majority into numbness. Helpless rage surges as
the burden of shouldering secular identity is thrust only on one community,
which is expected to put up with the intolerance.
Before people could even recover from this chilling incident
and ruthless extremism, the usual suspects are at work whitewashing the
dastardly crime. Elite liberals, doubling up as terrorist sympathisers, justified
the attacks. Accusing the government of Hindutva, they swiftly rationalised the
ghastly attack.
Buried within this opaque liminal clutter of gibberish is an
undeniable truth. The terror attack is nothing but a Hindu-Muslim issue.
Reluctant to call a spade a spade, intellectuals continue to churn out several
rationalist theories. Partition of India along the religious lines attests to
this inexorable truth.
Despite conceding 33% of land in partition, rooted in the
two-nation theory, founded on an intolerant ideology which killed over 8
million, peace eluded India. Even before the partition ink was dry, Pakistan
unleashed attacks on India. Starting from the Kabali raids in Kashmir of
October 1947 till the latest Pahalgam terror attacks, the rabid ideology
incarnate, Pakistan, continues to foment terror from across the borders and
through domestic actors as well. Indeed, the recent Murshidabad Waqf protests,
reminiscent of the Muslim League’s call for Direct Action of 1946, eight
decades ago, bespeak of fanatical underpinnings.
For decades, Pakistan has weaponised terrorism to
destabilise India. Almost every major terror attack in India has an irrefutable
Pakistani link to it. Being a useful vassal, China shielded it, and the US
turned a blind eye to Islamabad’s Ghazwa-e-Hind policy as a destabilised India
can remain an underwhelming power. Getting away with mild censure, Pakistan has
been waging this asymmetric civilisational war against India.
Peace in Kashmir has always been an intervening period
between two terror attacks. Balakot surgical strikes and India’s retaliation
after the Uri attacks have prolonged this intermittent peace. Abrogation of
Article 370 has inflicted a death blow to Pakistan’s attempts to stoke
separatism. The long-standing Kashmir conflict served as the cannon fodder for
the Pakistani Army Generals to enjoy unrestrained authority in Pakistan.
New Delhi’s determined all-out terrorism cleansing
activities, along with growing mistrust of Pakistan’s public towards the Army
and its setbacks at the hands of TTP and the Balochistan separatists, have
eroded the prestige of the Army. Especially, the Baloch separatists' Jaffar
Express hijacking in March has severely dented the Pakistani Army's image.
To shift the focus of domestic constituents and stem brewing
discontent, Pakistan Army General Asim Munir, addressing the Pakistani Diaspora,
ranted and raved against India. He rekindled the spirit of the two-nation
doctrine, reiterating the differences between Hindus and Muslims in terms of
religion, tradition and custom. He also termed Kashmir as ‘jugular vein’.
In Pakistan, the Army calls the shots and maintains an iron
grip over the country’s polity with the appointed civilian administration
working as per its whims and fancies. Munir comes from a religious family, and
his father is an Imam. Educated in a religious seminary under an Islamic
preacher, Munir is overtly religious and has openly advocated for jihad on
several occasions. With his ascent, Islamisation of Pakistan’s army has been
complete.
The Pakistan army has nurtured several terrorist outfits as
part of its military strategy. Munir, who considers India as Dar al-Harb
(territory not under Islamic rule), strongly approves of the utilisation of terror
organisations for proxy wars as a religious obligation. Munir’s public raving
triggered the attack as intelligence agencies now reveal that Laskhar-e-Taiba
(LeT) cadres conducted a recce of hotels in Kashmir in the first week of April.
On April 18, LeT chief Abu Musa held a rally in Rawalkot,
declaring, “Jihad will continue, guns will rage and beheadings will continue in
Kashmir. India wants to change the demography of Kashmir by giving domicile
certificates to non-locals”. Days later, the emboldened terrorists murdered
Hindu tourists holidaying in the valley with barbarity. The Resistance Force
(TRF), the proxy of LeT, has claimed responsibility for the attack. The attacks
served twin purposes- creating fear for lives among Hindus from moving and settling
in J&K and challenging the government’s claims of restoration of normalcy
in J&K.
All the fashionable theories of oppression, discrimination,
poverty and lack of opportunities inciting terrorism are a sham. Driven by the
radical ideology that seeks complete dominance, State and non-state actors across
the globe have espoused terrorism. Co-existence is an anathema to this
ideology. Despite decades of asymmetric hybrid war against India, Pakistan
hardly faced any consequences for its state-sponsored terrorism.
India must inflict heavy costs on Pakistan for the unabated
cross-border terrorism. Radical extremist ideology has been at the heart of
this hybrid war. Until the ideology is snuffed out, its venomous terror
offshoots would continue to unsettle India. Terrorism is a scourge, the world
can ill afford to ignore. But sadly, nations dodge around in taking a firm
stance, getting into a good and bad terrorism trap. The elephant in the room is
radicalism-driven terrorism.
The enormity of extricating this terrorism is twofold for
India. Alongside the complete neutralisation of the active terrorist cadres and
their handlers, India must take to task the terrorism sympathisers- the
organisations, pseudo intellectual networks, the veritable Fifth Column that
continues to provide cover fire to the perfidious terror agenda.
State and non-state actors weaponising and exporting
terrorism must be globally alienated. The time for tough action is now. India
must leverage its rising international stature and diplomatic clout to
blacklist and isolate Pakistan. Celebration of this exclusivist radical
ideology under the garb of Islamophobia must be stemmed.
With Pakistan activating brothers-in-arms across the Eastern
border now, India must deliver a knockout punch to Pakistan to send a strong
message to terror modules harbouring a pernicious anti-India agenda. India must
strike at the very core of the Pakistan military establishment to paralyse the
terrorism network. New Delhi’s response to Pahalgam should be visible to
everyone.
No comments:
Post a Comment