Thursday 9 January 2020

Amidst heightened tensions, Iran seeks India’s initiation for de-escalation


In the aftermath of assassination of Iranian Commander Qasem Soleimani, amidst unprecedented geopolitical churning in the Middle East, things are moving thick and fast. The scale of activity and the casualties are now grabbing the headlines. A day after killing of Soleimani, six people were reportedly killed in an air strike on a convoy carrying Popular Mobilisation Forces (PMF) pro-Iranian militia in North Baghdad. This was followed by two rocket attacks in Green Zone of Baghdad towards US Embassy. Ketaib Hezbollah widened attacks and hurled motor shells at US Embassy. Incidentally on the same day al-Shahbaab terror operatives attacked US air base in Kenya killing an American soldier and two US contractors. Shia militia intensified attacks on American assets.

Stirring this geopolitical cauldron, Trump warned of cultural bombing if Iran continues to attack American personnel or assets.  He indicated that 52 cultural sites are identified for this purpose, the number of Americans held hostage by Iran during the 1979 revolution. This triggered an international debate and forced Trump to tone down his rhetoric. Softening the stance, State secretary Pompeo initiated talks with diplomats of various countries and apprised them of the situation in Middle East.

Iraqi Wrath

But emotions are running high in both Iran and Iraq. As expected, Iran is irrevocably miffed by the killing of the second in the order of power, Soleimani. Iraq is interminably angered by the death of the deputy commander of PMU Abu Mahdi al-Muhandis. PMU which fought with Al-Qaeda and ISIS is a legitimate force. Deeming the assassination of a commander in airstrike by America as a violation of an agreement by occupational forces, Iraq fired first salvo. Iraq which has become theatre of current conflict, drummed up its protest against America. In an extraordinary parliamentary session, Iraq passed a resolution demanding the expulsion of foreign troops. Parliament stated that with the defeat of IS in 2017, the purpose of stationing of international coalition has been accomplished. Hence the 5200 American troops must be ordered to leave Iraq. It called the end of 2014 resolution that welcomed coalition troops into the country. But the radical groups felt that Iraqi government’s rather timid response for the violation of sovereignty and escalation was too little.

Interestingly, not everyone was really dismayed by the killing of Soleimani and Iraqi commander. Indeed, people cheered and danced on roads of Baghdad when the first reports filtered in. Kurds and Sunnis who suffered at the hands of dominant Shia militia in Iraq desired American presence. Most Iraqi’s detested growing Iranian influence in the region and huge protests in the past of couple months symbolised Iraqis growing distrust and dissent towards the Pro-Iranian Shia political establishment. But the high-profile assassinations of two prominent Shia militia commanders brought Iran and Iraq together, boosting Shia consolidation and eventually pushing Iraq into Iran’s embrace.

In response to the Iraq’s non-binding Parliamentary resolution, President Trump threatened to impose with tough economic sanctions if American troops are forced to leave. He asked Baghdad to cough up billions of dollars that went into building of robust military bases in their country.

Iran designates US Military forces as terrorists

On the other hand, Iran announced that it would no longer abide by restrictions on Uranium enrichment imposed by the 2015 nuclear deal. Keeping its option, it agreed to cooperate with the International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA) officials but rejected requests from France, Britain and Germany to honour nuclear deal.

Iran parliament approved a bill designating all American military forces as terrorists. It approved $220 million assistance to Quds force to seek vengeance for the death of Soleimani. The threat of cultural bombing united Iranians lie never before. While the entire populace of Iran hasn’t revered Soleimani as a cult figure, American threat stirred passions and as a mark of solidarity larger crowds turned up the final journey of Soleimani. Huge turnout of sea of humanity and their emotional outburst indeed propelled the Iranian establishment to prop up strong retributive posturing.  Close on heels, over 60 people died and 200 injured during a stampede in Soleimani’s funeral process in Iran.

War of words escalated after Quds force new commander Ghaani and Hezbollah secretary Nasrallah promised of proportionate attacks against American forces. Tehran’s Revolutionary Guards threatened to turn Israeli cities Haifa and Tel Aviv into dust if America attacks Iran. In an overdrive to secure its assets and forces from Iranian missile attacks, America deployed extra troops to the region and even stationed air craft carriers, ballistic missiles to the Diego Garcia base.

Iran’s Missile attacks on American bases

Hours before final burial of Soleimani, vowing a crushing revenge Iran fired 22 ballistic missiles at American bases Ain al-Asad in Western Iraq and Erbil. Iraqi state broadcast claimed that the attacks killed 80 American “terrorists”. Supreme Commander Khomeini called it a slap on the face of America and demanded complete withdrawal of US troops from the region. After the attacks, Zavad Zarif, Iraqi foreign minister tweeted, “Iran took & concluded proportionate measures in self defense under the article 51 of UN charter targeting base from which cowardly armed attack against our citizens & senior officials were launched. We don’t seek escalation of war but will defend ourselves against any aggression”.

Before Iran hit the US targets in Iraq, Tehran informed Iraq, Lithuania, Finland of impending attacks. Siren from the advanced warning systems believed to have alerted US soldiers giving them enough time to escape to safe shelters. As a result, not a single casualty was reported so far. President Trump’s tweet of “All is Well” summed up the outcome.

Around the same time, a Ukrainian air lines Boeing 737 with 177 passengers and crew on broad crashed near Imam Khomeini airport. Initial reports indicate that plane plunged to ground as a huge ball of fire. The deceased includes 82 Iranians, 63 Canadians, 11 Ukrainians, 10 Swedes, 4 Germans 3 Britons, and 3 Afghans. Hours after the crash Ukrainian embassy indicated that engine failure caused the plane crash. Even Iran quickly concluded that a technical failure resulted in a crash and refused to hand over the black box to American company Boeing. Much to the consternation of Iran, Ukrainian Airlines dismissed Embassy’s reports as unofficial. Though some agencies attributed the crash to Boeing’s disastrous recent record on safety with its planes, but Iran’s refusal to cede the black box and pictures of the plane wreckage are now pointing to a plausible missile attack by Iran. While the international community engrossed by developments in the Middle East side-lined the plane crash, countries of the deceased will now pull up Iran for this blatant act of terrorism (if any). Call it a stroke of bad coincidences, hours after the missile attacks two earthquakes of magnitude 4.9 and 4.5 in a span of 30 minutes struck the region close to the nuclear power plant in Bushehr province of Iran raising more suspicions about Tehran’s nuclear activities.

As tensions continued to escalate after the attacks and counter attacks, World has been on the edge. Interestingly important geopolitical players have stepped in to consolidate support, deescalate and to reassure their allies in the region. After the calls for evacuation of American troops gained strength, China dispatched its ambassador, Zhang Tao offering military assistance to Iraq. Amidst the mayhem, Russian President Putin made an unannounced visit to Syria with reports of Bashar al-Assad’s levitation to Tehran gaining ground. Russian President landed in Syria to cobble up support. Japanese Prime Minister Shinzo Abe who was supposed to visit Saudi Arabia, UAE and Oman to explain them about Tokyo’s plans of deploying Maritime Self-Defense Forces (MSDF) forces to the region cancelled his visit hours after Iran’s attack on American bases. Leaders of Jordan, Oman and European countries called for de-escalation.

Iran seeks India’s moderation

Days before the arrival of Iranian Foreign Minister Zavad Zarif to India to speak at Raisina Dialogue, Iranian ambassador Ali Chegeni speaking to the reporters at the side lines of the condolence meeting organised by the embassy “welcomed India’s initiative to reduce tensions”. India which has close ties with the US and Iran adopted a rather cautious approach even at the height of escalating tensions in the Middle East. New Delhi has been closely watching the developments in the region where it has strategic interests. After the eruption of tensions, Indian Foreign Minister Jaishankar Subramanian spoke to his counterpart and Prime Minister Modi discussed about “regional security matters” with President Trump. Describing India, as a good friend, Chegeni said, “India plays a very good role in peace in the World. India belongs to this region. We welcome initiatives from all countries, especially India as good friend for us, to not allow escalation”. He reiterated that Iran is not seeking war, aspires to have peace and prosperity and welcomed India’s initiative to bring peace and prosperity for entire World. Clearly, India which is among the very few countries to have good relations with both Iran and the US will not favour any side. Given its strong economic, social, religious and cultural linkages with the region, India will not allow tensions to escalate. Post sanctions regime, India was forced to zero its oil imports from Iran. This took a toll on the bilateral ties. By seeking India’s initiation, Iran has vanquished apprehensions of doubting Buddha’s regarding the completion and operationalisation of Chabahar port. Ever since Iranian-US relations soured, every rising threat and escalation involving Iran posed fresh hurdles in obtaining finances from international banks for the port construction.  In 2016, India signed trilateral transit agreement with Iran and Afghanistan to develop an alternative connectivity network. Appreciating Indian efforts in augmenting Afghanistan’s economic interests, despite its animosity towards Iran, it welcomed the development of Chabahar port, located in the Sistan-Baluchistan province. US even exempted the port related activities from the sanctions.

But America’s oral assurance, failed to assuage fears of international financiers. Days ahead of Soleimani’s killing, at the second 2+2 Indo-US Ministerial Dialogue, India obtained a written assurance from US stating that Chabahar is exempt from the sanctions list to accelerate its operationalisation. Sanctions fear stalled the construction of Chabahar port and transactions for the past eight months. Following the written assurance, India managed to woo investors and work just began. But the fresh round of escalations has scared global investors who are now assessing the economic viability of the project. After the Soleimani episode, India has again reached out to Iran and expressed its interest to expedite Chabahar project which has been cornerstone of its connectivity network to Central Asia and Afghanistan bypassing Pakistan. As of now, India hasn’t responded to Iranian envoy’s message. Involvement in Middle East is going to be a tight diplomatic walk necessitating vigorous diplomacy. Tehran’s invitation to be on board is an endorsement of India’s rising global stature.

In the meanwhile, easing tensions temporarily, Trump assured Iran of no further US military strikes but announced fresh sanctions.


@ Copyrights reserved.

No comments: