Pro-Palestine student protests at the universities are taking the US by storm. Prolonged protests and their clampdown decried, as an attribute of the third world, the West spearheaded by the US from a high moral pedestal used lectured countries on freedom to protest and human rights. Western academics lashing out at India and lent support to the dubbed dissent echoing anti-national sentiments with “azadi” slogans permeating the university campuses; deemed the restrictions on protests as silencing of ‘free speech’. In fact, in line with the Western perception of declining liberties, the Freedom House has downgraded India’s ranking for the alleged “democratic backsliding” and rampant “crackdown”.
Ironically,
when similar “azadi” slogans rented air at Princeton University in a
pro-Palestine protest, Indian-origin student Achintya Shivalingan was arrested1.
The US is now overwhelmed by the student protests that began in response to the
Israeli offensive in Gaza, after Hamas' surprise terror attack on October 7. In
support of Palestine demanding a ceasefire, they began blocking military
shipments to Israel from US ports, tore up posters of Israeli hostages held by
Hamas and to gain more traction started holding massive demonstrations.
Over the
months, the isolated, sporadic protests have now culminated into well-planned
protests with strategic messaging and a demand charter to end the campus
blockades. The student protests at Columbia University stipulated severing ties
with companies supporting Israel, amnesty for students and faculty involved in the
protests and disclosure of university funding sources. Unlike Portland State
University which agreed to snap ties with Boeing for its links with Israel and
acceded to student demands, the President of Columbia University refused to give
in to the demands of the protests and issued a deadline to remove encampments.
Defying the
deadline, the students continued to chant, “Disclose, divest! We will not
stop, We will not rest”. Indeed, the situation escalated after pro-Palestine
demonstrators vandalised, blockaded and took control of Albert Hamilton Hall.
They renamed it “Hind Hall” after a six-year-old Palestinian boy, Hind
Rabayah, killed during Israeli military action in Gaza. This takeover raised
suspicions of outside instigators following which the university administration
pressed for police help. The police entered the campus in riot gear and made
hundreds of arrests. Indeed, police crackdown has begun across many
universities- University of California, Los Angeles; City College of New York,
Emory University, Georgia; University of Texas, Austin and many more. Hundreds
of students were arrested and temporary tents were cleared.
To evict the
encampments and quell the scuffles between the pro-Palestine and pro-Israeli
demonstrators, police used force against anyone who resisted. They zip-tied the
activists, used pepper sprays and stun grenades. Even professors weren’t spared.
In fact a video professor being knocked down on the ground with her head
smashed against a concrete sidewalk, while two police officers pinned her hands
behind her back and handcuffed her went viral.
The US which
sermonised India on human rights and the right to protest has unhesitantly
deployed state instruments to come down heavily on the protesting students. The
police excesses on student protestors on university campuses have blatantly
exposed the double standards of the US which never leaves an opportunity to
lecture Global South countries.
Since the Israeli
offensive on Gaza a steady undercurrent of antisemitism, which has been an
integral part of the leftist academia started acquiring critical mass. The
pro-Palestine protests at Columbia University, known as the “Gaza Solidarity
Camp” with numerous tents mimicked a mini Gaza with kaffiyeh-donning
students. Indoctrinated with heavy doses of antisemitism, stepping up an
initiative “Popular University for Gaza” amid chants of “We are Hamas”
placards bearing “Al-Qassem’s next targets” the protestors under the
garb of Palestinian solidarity have meandered into the dangerous territory of defending
the terror outfit Hamas. (Al-Qassem brigades carried out murderous attacks on
Israelis). With the death toll in Gaza now reaching 34,000 and still counting
the condemnation of Israel is valid and genuine. But the protests overstepped
the redline by celebrating Hamas.
With every
passing day, the scale and spread of protests are growing. Universities have
cancelled the commencement of fresh sessions, postponed graduation ceremonies
and suspended the protesting students. Some universities shut down the regular
classes and resorted to off-mode teaching after clashes between protestors and
counter-protestors intensified.
By and
large, the protests have exposed the potent threat from the ‘exacting
standards of progressivism’ elaborated by the leftist academicians and
activists. A concept that is laid in black and white, advocates for standing
with the oppressed against the oppressor, even if the oppressed is undemocratic.
Driven by moral inversion, Israel is the veritable oppressor and by this logic,
Hamas, an extension of the Muslim Brotherhood, -inspired by a repressive
version of Islam, carrying out grotesque suicidal attacks on helpless children
and women are deemed revolutionary. Their acts are passed off as an exemplar of
social justice.
A student
official at the University of London once tweeted, “I clearly don’t identify
with the ideology Hamas promotes. However, in the event of a conflict between
Israel and the Palestinians, I would take Hamas’s side”. Student protests
on university campuses across the US are in fact, a conspicuous manifestation
of antisemitism. National Union of
Students (NUS) in its report, cited a statement of a Palestinian saying, “I
find it deeply offensive that support for Palestinian human rights is being
used to mask blatant antisemitism”. The students’ protests have
unfortunately slid deep into a crevasse of progressive activism that routinely
accuses Israel of “settler colonialism, apartheid, ethnic cleansing and land
theft”.
Occupying
the highest positions, the progressives with a disproportionate influence who
form the major chunk of the academicians in the Ivy League Universities, enforce
their thoughts on the students. As self-appointed gatekeepers, overly
supportive of the so-called oppressed, these hyper-liberals are setting the
tone of the academic environment. Advancing punitive cancel culture, the
evangelical radical liberals are rewriting the tenets on university campuses.
Jake Wallis Simons, the author of Israeophobia notes, “antisemitism has
become a non-negotiable ticket of entry into the left discourse”.
The current
protests are an outcome of this larger malaise that has spawned across the
leftwing bastions that chose to whitewash the radical ideology. In the line of
hierarchy, Israel is a “hyper-white” oppressor and a colonist state
whose “right to exist” must be challenged. The brewing synergy between
the liberals, authoritarian regimes and hardcore Islamists has afflicted the
academic world for long and has come home to roost with these protests. As the
initial investigations reveal, the protests are funded by anti-zionist groups 2
masquerading as charitable 3 and cultural institutions.
Alarmed by
the raging riot-like situations in several universities, the US House of
Representatives, getting down to the crux of the issue has passed a bill to
combat antisemitism on campuses. Though it is a measure in the right direction,
antisemitism isn’t going anywhere unless the entire ecosystem of progressive
activists is taken to task. This is a major challenge for democratic countries.
Grappling
with a series of protests that threatened to disrupt and choke the national capital,
India’s stringent measures to curtail the protests from turning into a national
movement were meted with widespread condemnation from the Western countries.
The US is currently facing a similar situation. Instead of approbation, expressing
concern, India remarked, “In every democracy, there has to be the right
balance between freedom of expression, sense of responsibility and public
safety and order. Democracies in particular should display this understanding
in this regard to other fellow democracies”, and added, “We are all
judged by what we do at home and not what we say abroad”.
Instructively,
given the free and open nature of democratic societies, vested interests and
authoritarian regimes have been strategically penetrating the institutions to
push inimical ideologies to foster dissensions and create unrest. As a
democratic country, akin to the US, India is facing serious threats from
adversaries and the leftist-Islamist cabal. Anti-India slogans were also raised
at the Columbian University, after an Indian extended solidarity to pro-Israeli
protestors. Now, Kashmir finds a mention in the demand charter of student
protestors at Rutgers University. It calls for “displaying the flags of
occupied people-such as Palestinians, Kurds and Kashmiris-alongside other
existing international flags”4.
With
protests now spreading to European countries, democratic nations must resist
the temptation of being politically right and stall the juggernaut of the
diabolical progressive activism from advancing dissonant cultural values under
the garb of DEI (Diversity, Equity and Inclusion).
@ Copyrights reserved.
No comments:
Post a Comment