Sunday 20 November 2016

Nuclear Deal, Geostrategic Alliance buttress Indo-Japanese bilateral Ties


Modi’s bonhomie with Prime Minister Shinzo Abe touched new pinnacles of bilateral Indo-Japanese bilateral engagement during the third annual summit at Tokyo. Right from the days as Chief Minister of Gujarat, Modi had a special relationship with Japan. On his eclectic visit to Japan as Prime Minister of India in 2014 both sides have elevated the relationship to a Special Strategic and Global Partnership and launched India-Japan Investment Promotion Partnership wherein Japan promised to invest $35 billion over a period of five years. In 2015, Abe on during his India visit outlined a vision for a “deep, broad-based and action-oriented partnership” and deals worth 93,000 crores were signed. Thus, previous annual bilateral meets were high on theatrics and content. Despite the warmth and personal chemistry between the leaders, that added heft to the friendship, experts were skeptical since the nuclear negotiations overdue for the past six years failed to reach a conclusion. On his three-day long to Japan which concluded on Nov 12th, Modi successfully heralded the conclusion of civil nuclear agreement between India and Japan.

Historic Indo-Japanese Relations

Indo-Japanese relations can be dated back to 7th century AD. In the long illustrious association of over 1400 years, both countries were never adversaries and the bilateral relations were devoid of any ideological, territorial or cultural disputes. India established diplomatic ties with Japan in 1952 and ever since relations were strengthened by high level bilateral visits. Japan has been instrumental in revolutionizing the Indian automobile industry. In early 1980’s Suzuki Motor Corporation first invested in India and transformed the sector. This was followed by companies by Mitsubishi, Toyota and Nissan. Japan was one of the few countries which bailed out India during the balance of payment crisis in 1991. Eventually, the foundation for the modern-day partnership was laid by Prime Minister Mori who on his visit to India in 2000 envisioned Japan-India Global Partnership. In 2006, Prime Minister Man Mohan Singh and Shinzo Abe added new dimensions of cooperation and upgraded it to Global Strategic Partnership with a provision for annual Prime Ministerial Summits. In 2011, Comprehensive Economic Partnership Agreement (CEPA) was concluded.

Japan is the third largest source of Foreign Direct Investment (FDI) in the past 15 years. But ironically, India’s trade ties with Japan have been fluctuating and lags that of China. A research paper authored by Peter Buckley and others on Indo-Japan economic ties indicated that raw materials shipped from India to Japan had facilitated Japan’s early industrialization. It says “by creating a direct shipping route between Mumbai and Kobe in 1883, a number of industrial conglomerates such as Mitsui and Mitsubishi had not only successfully challenged international competitors but also established trade between two countries”. By 1915, trade ties fluctuated and gained momentum only in early 1980’s but again they suffered when India conducted nuclear tests in 1998. Currently, India is keen on accelerating economic growth and aspires to reduce bilateral trade imbalances with China. To finance the needs of an emerging economy, experts believe that India must deeply engage with Japan.

Nuclear Deal

Nuclear deal with Japan, a country who suffered the brunt of nuclear attacks and strongly upholds the anti-nuclear test is indeed historic. Japan had reservations about inking a deal with non-signatory to NPT (Nuclear Proliferation Treaty) and CTBT (Comprehensive Test Ban Treaty). Japan acceding to a nuclear pact with India is thus truly significant. Japan’s move strengthened India’s pursuit for a place in NSG club at a time, when India’s inclusion is to be discussed at the upcoming NSG meet at Vienna. Unlike the civil nuclear deal with US, which was finalized in four different stages which included signing of 123 agreement in 2007, NSG clearance in 2008, reprocessing in 2010 and the final stage of signing administrative agreement in 2015, the pact with Japan has all the four stages rolled into one. While the details of the pact are not public, this treaty had laid foundation for bilateral cooperation in nuclear energy. The deal wasn’t easily cut and several rounds of negotiations preceded the pact. India with its impeccable nuclear record convinced Japan by harmonizing the export control system along the guidelines and annexes of NSG. The basic parameters of Indo-Japanese nuclear deal are like that of Indo-US deal where a termination clause does exist. As per the “termination and cessation clauses”, nuclear cooperation cease to exist the moment India conducts a nuclear test obviating compliance to NPT.

The stunning victory of Donald Trump, who made controversial remarks about recalibration of Sino-US ties has indeed portended well for India. While India and Japan had a sustained partnership with cooperation extending to several sectors, clinching of nuclear pact appeared to be difficult. An uncertain US foreign policy and burgeoning Chinese assertiveness propelled Japan to engage in a formidable geostrategic understanding with India, which is mutually beneficial.  This agreement augurs well for Abe, a revisionist leader who is now slowly revamping Japan’s defence cooperation and foreign policy. From economic stand point, nuclear deal is a win-win situation for both countries. The use of nuclear energy hit a new low in Japan post-Fukushima disaster in 2011 and the public outcry warranted restraints on the continuation of nuclear energy as single viable energy source. Japan’s ailing nuclear industry is in search of lucrative markets. By signing the deal, Japanese government can revive its domestic nuclear energy industry while India can reduce its reliance on the energy exports and pursue its lofty ambitions of clean energy. Burdened by increasing levels of pollution and burgeoning energy needs, India’s new energy policy is now focusing on non-fossil fuel energy resources with special emphasis on nuclear energy.

During his visit, Modi called upon Emperor Akihito, traveled to Kobe in Shinkansen bullet train to visit Kawasaki Heavy Industries Ltd manufacturing unit and addressed the Indian Diaspora. Aside, the landmark nuclear deal, both Prime Ministers agreed to expanded the ambit of cooperation in high technology, space, clean energy, infrastructure, smart cities, biotechnology, pharmaceuticals, ICT, education and skills to deepen strategic engagement with Japan.

Other significant outcomes

 Agreement was reached on the sale of 12 US-2 amphibian aircrafts, that can increase India’s air surveillance capacities in Arabian Sea and Indian Ocean. To accelerate the Mumbai-Ahmedabad High Speed Rail (MAHSR) the Ground Breaking Ceremony would be held in 2017. To enhance the Manufacturing Skill Transfer Promotion Program, it was decided that around 30,000 Indian personnel would be trained over the next 10 years through establishment of Japan-India Institutes for Manufacturing (JIM)s which would be set up in states of Karnataka, Maharashtra and Gujarat. Japan intends to support upgradation of ship-recycling units at Alang, Gujarat.

Strengthen cooperation in enhancing connectivity in North East India, building smart cities, smart islands and Japan Industrial Townships (JIT). To promote investment of Japanese companies in India, Nippon Export and Investment Insurance (NEXI) and Japan Bank for International Cooperation (JBIC) will finance up to 1.5 trillion Yen to implement Japan-India Make in India Special Finance Facility. Both sides agreed to work jointly and cooperatively with international community to promote development of industrial corridors and networks in Asia and Africa including the infrastructure development and connectivity of Chabahar port.

A MoU was signed between Gujarat State and Hyogo Prefecture (Shinkansen agreement). Other MoU’s were in sectors of infrastructure, sports, space cooperation and cultural exchange. Abe announced relaxation of visas for Indian students and pledged to expand the visa application sites to 20. Abe reaffirmed support to India’s entry into three nuclear regimes- NSG, Wassenaar Arrangement and Australian Group.

Prime Ministers affirmed faith in deepening bilateral security and defense cooperation through 2+2 dialogue, defence policy dialogue, military to military talk and coast coast guard cooperation. Both sides supported each other’s candidature into expanded UNSC. Under the India’s Act East Policy and Japan’s Enhanced Partnership for Quality Infrastructure leaders laid foundation for synergizing bilateral relationship. Deepening cooperation on global challenges like climate change, nuclear proliferation, countering terrorism, violent extremism, nuclear terrorism, maritime security, cyber security, UN reforms and maintaining rule based international order.

Geostrategic Front

China has been flustered by growing cooperation between India and Japan. Days before Modi’s visit to Japan, China’s state media began publishing articles warning India of inclement repercussions, if Modi supports Japan’s stance on SCS. An open ed of Global Times, Chinese State media said “India wouldn’t gain much by balancing China through Japan instead it would lead to more distrust between New Delhi and Beijing”. It added India will suffer great losses if India supports Japan’s stance on South China Sea (SCS). Unfazed by petulant Chinese warnings, Modi joined Abe in seeking peaceful resolution of disputes in SCS. They urged the parties “to resolve disputes through peaceful means without resorting to threat or use of force and exercise self-restraint” and asked them “to show utmost respect to UNCLOS”. They stressed the importance of resolving disputes by peaceful means “in accordance with universally recognized principles of international law including UNCLOS parties to resolve disputes”. Though China may not take India’s remarks kindly, India concurred with Japan in the Joint Statement.

Earlier, Japan invested heavily in China, eventually catalyzing its economic resurgence. Of late, rising anti-Japan sentiment, territorial disputes, declaration of Air Defense Identification Zone (ADIZ) over East China Sea by China and economic slowdown prompted Japanese companies to shift bases to other ASEAN countries under Plus One Strategy. Considering the geopolitical factors and economic vantage, Japanese companies have shifted bases and are now investing in ASEAN countries. By reaffirming interest in enhancing cooperation in trade, infrastructure development and connectivity an interest shared by both sides, Modi hit the right notes. In its effort to emerge as a key player, India has certainly found a reliable partner in Japan.

China is visibly ruffled by the deepening of cooperation between India and Japan in various areas which undeniably has a greater geostrategic implication. Modi through his proactive outreach under Act East policy made it amply clear that India is trying to counterbalance China. Beijing is now wary of the Strategic diamond or the Asian Security Diamond, unveiled by Shinzo Abe in response to China’s growing assertiveness and strategic maritime penetrance. Abe in his address to Indian Parliament in 2007 spoke of Confluence of Seas indicating that “safety and security of Western Pacific and Indian Ocean were indivisible and that Japan and India should take lead in conjunction with like-minded nations to ensure maritime security of what is now jointly referred as the Indo Pacific Asia”. He envisaged a maritime cooperation between Japan, India, Australia and US state of Hawaii. China perceives this as a Democratic Security Diamond targeted to encircle it. With US under the unpredictable President Trump, might in every likelihood withdraw from Obama’s Asia pivot. Thus, to counterbalance the growing assertiveness of China in Asia, India and Japan should have formidable understanding and cooperation. In the meanwhile, China shouldn’t necessarily raise alarm over the deepening strategic ties between India and Japan as India approach has never been about containment.

@ Copyrights reserved.

No comments: