Knowingly or unknowingly, the secular trope of “all religions are the same” was accepted by Indian society. Perhaps, beleaguered by centuries of invasions and infiltrations by foreigners, beguiling Bharatvarsha, forfeiting hard thinking, unwittingly began validating the sameness of the religion. Fed on the diet of pseudo-secularism to ensure religious harmony, the inherent differences between the Indic religions and Abrahamic religions were consciously overlooked.
The charade
of harmony built on the foundation of faux secularism is posing a threat to the
civilisational values of the indigenous populace now. The constant clash is
becoming more real and apparent. Even years of accommodation by the natives have
failed to bring about anticipated communal cohesion. With pluralism, the
bedrock of the native civilisation suffering collateral damage, it becomes
incumbent on Bharatiyas to understand and internalise the foundational
doctrines of the Abrahamic religions. As
opposed to the Indic religions which are experiential, the faith-based,
monotheistic religions hold a binary worldview with the instructions flowing
down to them from a book.
Bharat has
recently witnessed a massive civilisation reclamation. The consecration of
Ayodhya Ram Mandir is a testimony to the tumultuous civilisational struggle of
five centuries. This marked the onset of a civilisational resurrection that
instilled a new awakening to protect our dharma from lurking dangers. As a
first step in this direction, Bharatiyas must shed the wilful blindness and
nonsensical validation of the sameness of religions. To comprehend the modus
operandi of the monolatrous religions, one can turn to the classical example of
the devastating fall of the Roman Empire with the emphatic rise of Christianity.
Catherine
Nixey in her book “The Darkening Age: The Christian Destruction of the
Classical World” unabashedly brings to the fore the fanatical zealotry that
has obliterated a pagan civilisation that marked an end to a specific thought
process that was effectively inclusive.
Laid out in
sixteen crisp chapters with an apt quote summarising the central theme, each
chapter explores various facets of Christianity. The book begins with a
melancholy and the trail of the destruction left behind by a “marauding band
of bearded, black-robed zealots” who reduced the centuries-old Palmyra’s
temple of Athena into a pile of rubble in AD 329. The swarms of thuggish men
defaced tombs, pulled down the roofs, tore down the temple, and mutilated
statues that stood haughtily echoing the artistic workmanship of the
Graeco-Roman culture.
The imperial
infrastructures which evoked admiration and amazement for the sophistry of
turning hard marble into a tender human frame failed to deter the zealots from
wielding a weapon to capitate them in a single stroke. In fact, not satisfied
with decapitation, the attackers, smashed the statues into pieces, sliced them
off arms and shoulders, fell them off from the pedestal, melted them and jeered
at the non-believers. The wanton destruction of idols, temples, and statues
signalled the triumph of a new religion, Christianity.
Before the
advent of Christianity, the broad spectrum of cults who inhabited the planet
were animists and believed in spirits and worshipped nature. They were never
referred to by a specific name. With the ascendency of Christians, the idol
worshippers were called Pagans and since then the slur of Paganism stuck with
them.
In sermons,
Christian preachers used to remind that the Pagan religion was demonically
inspired. Augustine roared, “All pagans were under the power of demons.
Temples were built to demons, altars were set up to demons, priests ordained
for the service of demons…” Romans whom the Christians derisively deemed as
pagans were religious but they weren’t dogmatic and unbending. Their Pantheon
expanded to include foreign gods. Diverse worship existed together. Egyptians
worshipped Zeus and Dionysus, in Arabia Ourania and Dionysus were worshipped.
Other important gods in Egypt were Osiris and Isis. Pagans revelled in
plurality and multiple gods existed together without discord. On the other
hand, Christians worshipped just one god but splintered into countless warring
factions.
Describing
the destruction of the temple of Serapis in Alexandria in great detail, the
author notes that one of the witnesses, Greek writer Eunapis recorded that the only
ancient treasure that was left unlooted from the temple was the floor.
Christians would even enter common baths, community areas and sometimes private
houses to loot anything and everything related to pagan worship. They would
then break the statues, mutilate them and burn them in jubilation. They
believed that statues were seats of demons and hence were subjected to attacks.
Indeed, a
Jewish treatise Avod Zarah even provided detailed instructions on how to
mistreat a statue. Indeed, after completely destroying the temple of Artemis
and temple of Apollo, Theophilus built a Church housing the relics of St. John
Baptist to insult pagan gods and their architecture.
Guided by
tenets that exhorted, “good Christians had a duty to vandalise false gods”,
East Pediment, the temple of Zeus at Apamea and the Dendera Temple complex at
the Nile were destroyed. Theodosius in 391 AD passed laws preventing the
worship of ‘(false) gods and Christian treatises like Deuteronomy, the fifth
book of the Old Testament, stated that ‘person indulging in idolatry to be
stoned to death’. Musical instruments were smashed and the famous theatres
of the Romans were banned and ordered to close down. They considered music
perilous saying it “might take away men’s senses and mesmerise them by
whipping them into frenzy of lust and ungodliness”.
Even the literary works weren’t spared.
Alexandria known for a staggering collection of books running into thousands of
volumes sheltering unique treatises from across the world on various subjects
was completely lost. Believed to be
burnt, never to reappear, a scholar Luciano Canfora observed, “the burning
of books was part of the advent of imposition of Christianity”.
Christians
attacked temples and libraries to obliterate all traces of Paganism. An attack
against a temple was an attack on the library as books were often stored in the
temple for safekeeping. What ensued was near total destruction of the classical
literature and scholarly works. In
Alexandria, Antioch and Rome bonfires of books were set ablaze as they
considered intellectuals heretical. They defended the acts saying books that
oppose Christian doctrine have no place in Christian society.
Debate,
discussion, and argumentation were anathema to the Christians who believed in
the canons of the god. They censored the Epicurean philosophy that countered
the Christian version of creation happened on October 23rd,4004 BC.
The works that dismissed the divine power were destroyed. The lone survivor, Democritus's
atomist theory, which was contained in Lucretius's great poem in a single
volume held in a German library. This work on the creation sparked great
interest and influenced Newton, Galileo and Einstein.
Christianity
simply lacked intellectual rigour. As Celsus notes early Christians celebrated
their ignorance. He states, “Christians were able to convince only the
foolish, dishonourable and stupid and only slaves, women and little children”.
The works of Arius, Porphyry, Galen, who
accused Christianity of unreasonable faith were destroyed. Hypatia the gifted
mathematician and philosopher was brutally lynched and killed.
The
exclusivity, bigotry and intransigent nature of Christianity, striking
disparate from the argumentative, observational and democratic Roman
Civilisation initially caused a dissonance.
Indeed, the first encounter between the Romans and Christians was not a
clash of religion but it was about a law and order situation. The Romans reluctant
to inflict any punishment on Christians for disobedience and causing disorder
would proffer financial incentives and persuade the Christians to sacrifice to
the gods which is agreeable to them. But the defiant Christians in their lunacy
for martyrdom which was meted with the greatest honour and respect would spit
in the face of the Romans to covet torturous punishments. In one such instance,
when a Roman officer threatened “If you do not respect the imperial decrees
and offer sacrifice, I am going to cut your head off”. Julius, a Christian
who was tried rather ungraciously replies that “to live with you would be
death for me”. Driven by lunacy for martyrdom, Christians insolently
provoked the authorities to announce harsh sentences.
Nero was the
first king who persecuted Christians. A novel on the story of Christian martyrs
put to death by Nero written by Henryk Sienkiewicz was awarded the Nobel Prize
in literature. But contrary to the popular discourse of thousands of Christians
being hunted and hounded, a Christian author Origen admitted, “the number of
martyrs was few enough to be easily countable and Christians had died for their
faith only ‘Occasionally’”. The so called “satanically inspired emperors
panting for blood of faith is Christian myth”.
Christian
histories are replete with martyrdom literature used conveniently to perpetrate a victimhood
narrative. The Romans were invariably portrayed by the Christians as the
oppressors with them being at the receiving end even as the imperial policy of
Romans was to ignore them and that they must not be hounded. Undoubtedly, in
the first few centuries of the emergence of Christian religion, religious
persecutions have occurred to allow the narrative to dominate is a “gross
misinterpretation” says the author.
Ironically,
the so called religion of love adopted a moralising tone and hectored
non-Christians to embrace their faith. This rigorously researched academic work
challenges the chronicles of history written by winners. The gripping and
heart-wrenching details of the book are no different from the countless tales
of sufferings inflicted by the Goan Inquisition back home. The rise of a
faith-based monotheistic religion in Western Asia caused the obliteration of
centuries-old civilisation in the region. Centuries later, the emergence of
another Abrahamic religion has emasculated even the traces of thriving Pagan
culture in patches across the world.
Bharat has
endured episodes of zealotry and religious fanaticism of not one but two
Abrahamic religions. But unfortunately, the left Commentariat continues to
portray the indigenous civilisation of Bharat as the Oppressor. With Bharatiyas
making a hard push to reclaim their civilisation they must banish muddled
mindset and cultivate intellectual awareness, towards the foundational concepts
and end goals of monotheistic religions.
Catherine
Nixey daughter of an ex-nun and an ex-monk and brought up as a Catholic for her
fond respect towards pagan culture brings out this polemic which exposes the
militant nature of early Christianity. This searingly passionate book written
unorthodoxly and backed by rigorous research should be a must-read by every
duty-bound dharmic individual. This deeply engaging and erudite book can be the
best antidote for minds clogged by decadent, “sarva dharma samabhava”.
@ Copyrights reserved.
No comments:
Post a Comment