In response to a petition in 2007, defending the Setusamudram project, the UPA government told the Supreme Court, “the contents of the Valmiki Ramayana, the Ramcharitamanas by Tulsidas and other mythological texts, which admittedly form an important part of ancient Indian literature… cannot be said to be a historical record to incontrovertibly prove the existence of the characters, or the occurrence of the events, depicted therein”. A vast section of the so-called opinion-makers and a cabal of historians perpetrated a narrative stating, “History requires concrete evidence in the form of coins, inscriptions, etc to prove the existence of a character. Even if we take into account the places mentioned in the Ramayana like Chitrakoot, and Ayodhya which still exist, the fact is that Ramayana is not a historical text. So, from that perspective, there is no historical evidence of Ram. Having said that, we still cannot negate Ram’s presence easily, since he has been part of our collective consciousness for a long time”2.
The dubious narrative notwithstanding the traditional categorization
of the Ramayana and Mahabharata as ‘Itihasas’ meaning “thus verily
happened” is a compilation of the history that has truly happened, reflects
the pervasive intellectual illiteracy of court historians and leftist academicians.
These texts of Sanatana Dharma have recorded events of history in meticulous
detail. But still, these are verily and summarily labeled as “Mythological
texts” to deny the Sanatanis their heritage.
Time and again the veracity of Bhagwan Rama is questioned
and the contentious debates reached a crescendo during the Ayodhya Rama
Janmabhoomi verdict case. Written in epic format, as slokas, for easy
memorization and learning, for millennia people preserved this history. Indeed,
much to the consternation of the leftist secularists who continued to dominate
the academic landscape with their distorted representation of ‘Itihasas’
as ‘Mythology’, an organic movement for reclaiming Sanatani
history started gaining new momentum. Contesting the ‘myth of mythology’,
Indologists have embarked on Chronology studies of ‘Itihasas’ to
legitimately debunk the pernicious campaign against Sanatani history.
These chronology studies have generated tremendous interest
among the younger generation toward our Itihasas. Adopting a
multi-disciplinary approach, a new tribe of Indologists is conclusively and
convincingly establishing the events of history recorded in the ‘Itihasas’.
Adding a fresh perspective, young debutant author and researcher, Jeevan Rao has
attempted to solve a baffling puzzle through his book- “Yuganta: The Advent
of Kaliyuga”.
Working out directly to solve the dilemma of a few
millenniums, the book outlines the research objective of finding the precise
year of the advent of Kaliyuga. The cosmic timeline is divided into four yugas
(caturyugas)- Krita, Treta, Dwapara and Kali Yuga respectively. The other units
are- Mahayuga, Manvantara and Kalpa. One Kalpa, a day of Brahma is equal to 14
Manvantaras. One Manvantara is 71 Mahayugas. The caturyugas are collectively
called Mahayugas. One Kalpa lasts for 4.32 billion years. Yuga is thus, the
smallest unit of the cosmic timeline.
Popular belief has been that arrival of Kaliyuga and the
Mahabharata story are closely linked. Various Chronology researchers of
Mahabharata made multiple claims regarding the first day of the Kali Yuga
attributing it to different incidents. Steering clear from the maze of claims
and counterclaims, the author expertly digs deep into Mahabharata to find the
answers to Kali Yuga beginning.
To make the book very interesting, the author attempts to
explain in detail every new verbatim, not part of the regular discourse
starting from the yuga definitions. He then slowly introduces the four
different categories of Yuga definitions: theoretical, philosophical, practical
and Chronological. With a focus on the Chronology aspect, the author
subsequently delves into the Puranic accounts of the Yuga definition and more
specifically about Kali Yuga. But Puranas being a collation of all aspects of
human life that existed at the time of their compilation and updating had some
pointers insufficient to determine the Chronology marker of Kali Yuga.
Whereas the epic narration of Mahabharata that recorded the
events in explicit detail offered clear hints about Yuganta. Diligently looking
for references to yuganta in the Mahabharata, the author classified over 100
references from the text into three categories- descriptive, comparative and
informative categories to precisely arrive at the right timeline for Yuganta.
Among the 70 references spread across the entire text, the majority of them
concentrated in the yuddha parvas ( Udyoga, Bhishma, Drona, Karna, Shalya,
Sauptika, Stri) turned out to be vital for locating the commencement of Kali
Yuga.
Though arduous for general reading, the author enlisted all
70 references with their English translations in the fourth chapter of the book.
This stepwise analysis essentially helped in arriving at a timeframe for
Yuganta. After substantially establishing the Chronology evidence, the author narrowed
down the precise time through astronomical evidence. Running the observations
through “the logic of stepwise regression” and corroborating with the shabda
pramana or the oral evidence, the author arrived at a definitive answer for
the astronomical evidence as well.
Decimating the apriori assumptions by interpreters
and researchers, and applying sensitivity analysis the author meticulously
arrives at the timeline of the advent of Kaliyuga. As a final litmus test, the
author validated his claims through Karl Poppers Truthlikeness Score (TS). The
book is refreshingly new and unique. Instead of attempting to fit the facts to
prove a hypothesis, the author painstakingly filters the references from a
panoply of sources.
Relying entirely on the primary sources to establish his
claims, the author made a breakthrough in nailing the commencement of Kali
Yuga. The appendix of the book loaded with rare snippets of information from
illustrious Sanatana texts is a must-read. Any perceptive reader can decipher
how truth becomes a casualty due to a lazy interpretation of Sanatana
Texts/ primary sources.
Refraining from divulging the time of commencement of Kali
Yuga that forms the kernel of the book and anticipating the reader to explore,
I would like to commend the author for his research acumen and methodical
approach. This book is indeed a bold
attempt for a debutant author of 23 years who began his research when he was
20.
@ Copyrights reserved.
No comments:
Post a Comment