With no signs of breaking the prolonged stalemate over disengagement of troops and Beijing’s unabated nibbling of Bhutan territory to position threateningly close to the chicken neck of India, New Delhi deployed 50,000 additional troops across LAC.
Days later spewing nationalism, the Dragon sent out a
fierce message to the World on the eve of CCP Centenary celebrations. Hitting
out at the adversaries, President Xi at centenary CCP speech warned, any
attempts to subjugate the country would result in “heads bashed bloody
against a Great Wall of Steel”. The remark which didn’t figure in the
Chinese government’s softened English translation resurfaced in the actual
translation exposing the true intentions of China.
Arguably, China which pitched for delinking the border
issues with the bilateral ties with India officials had no qualms in sending
its uncompromising stance on issues of national interest to the World and
expects New Delhi to continue with business as usual.
China’s stealthy intrusion across the LAC when India
was distracted by the Covid lockdown hasn’t gone down well with India. The
prolonged standoff, 15 months long has turned LAC into a hot zone. Refusing to
restore status quo ante, planning to push LAC west, Beijing began amassing
troops and erecting shelters in contravention to mutual agreements. Eruption of
violence has only exacerbated tensions and deepened mistrust. Consequently,
Tibet became the focus area for China.
A month into the standoff, China issued third White
paper on Tibet commemorating the 71st year of signing of 17-point
agreement between Lhasa and Beijing. The Whitepaper had important aspects-
firstly, having tight- leash on the succession process of the Dalai Lama and
sinicizing of Tibetan Buddhism. The third unspoken aspect was based on Xi’s
observation at the National People’s Congress in 2013, “to govern the
country well we must first govern the frontiers well, and to govern the
frontiers well we must first ensure stability in Tibet”.
Accordingly, Beijing gave renewed push to its Border
Villages Program, akin to salami slicing of South China Sea (SCS), where
civilian settlements are built along disputed border to reinforce its claims.
These villages besides serving as eyes and ears for the PLA would alter the
demography of the region. Satellite images spotted one such village close to
Arunachal border, the region which China calls as Southern Tibet.
Analysts later alluded that China is on a village
building spree along the strategic borders with Nepal, Bhutan and India. Taking
objection to India’s rapid infrastructure development projects along the LAC,
China has ramped up connectivity to Tibetan plateau.
With a focus on Tibet at the 7th Tibetan
Forum, held on August 29th, 2020 Beijing called for immediate
fortification the roof of the World into a fortress. In a bid to safeguard the
border and facilitate delivery of strategic goods during crises, China
expedited border infrastructure connectivity plans. Accordingly, China unveiled
a bullet train connecting the capital Lhasa to Nyingchi, 17 km from Arunachal
Pradesh border days ahead to CCP centenary.
Galwan incident and India’s occupation of strategic
Kailash Heights exemplified the combat prowess of Indian Army and left an
indelible mark on PLA. Special Frontier
Force (SFF), a regiment comprising majorly of Tibetan commandos of Indian Army
meticulously executed this operation.
While Chinese conscripts struggled to acclimatize and guard the icy
peaks along the LAC, influenced by the sturdiness of Tibetans in exile serving
the Indian Army, China initiated induction of Tibetans into PLA and Special
Tibetan Army unit (STAU). Reportedly coercive drives are underway making its
mandatory for each family to send at least one person for recruitment
especially in Ngari prefecture.
The massive induction is unlikely to yield any results
relationship between the Hans and Tibetans is marred by trust deficit. Besides a statement by Dalai Lama extending
support to India can force Tibetans to desert PLA.
Gearing up to take on India, China is slowly converting
the temporary structures into permanent positions and upgrading the airbases
along the Indo-Tibetan border. Fighter and bombers are now moved to the
airbases in Tibet-Hotan, Kashgar, Gargunsa, Lhasa-Gonggar and Shigatse.
Needless to say, all these developments, leave no iota of doubt that China is
no mood for de-escalation.
Annexing Tibet, China has become India’s neighbour. Beijing
started using Tibet as launch pad for its territorial incursions. The prolonged
15-month long standoff has tested India’s “strategic patience”. With Beijing
relentlessly needling India’s affairs through Nepal, Pakistan, Sri Lanka and
Maldives, India which has sheltered the Dalai Lama for over 60 years shedding
diffidence played the Tibet card. Tibet is at the heart of India China dispute.
PM Modi for the first time since 2014, greeted Dalai Lama on his birthday on
July 6th and tweeted about his telephonic conversation.
Since 2008 there has been slight shift in India’s
Tibet policy. In 2014, Modi invited Head of Central Tibetan Administration
(CTA), Lobsang Sangay to his inauguration and allowed the Dalai Lama to visit
Tawang in 2017 and Sangay to unfurl Tibetan flag at Pangong Tso. Post-Doklam,
adhering to Wuhan Consensus, Modi softened India’s stand and asked officials to
avoid participating in events on the eve of 60 years of Dalai Lama’s arrival in
India. But the current stand-off frayed the ties.
Modi’s tweet has been India’s way of reminding China
of its support to the Dalai Lama and his right to appoint a successor.
Principle of reincarnation and Dalai Lama succession are of immense importance
to China. Beijing is making aggressive moves to scuttle the process and appoint
its lackey as the 15th Dalai Lama to crush the Tibetan resistance
for eternity.
As a message to China, India allowed Tibetans to
celebrate the Dalai Lama birthday this year in the areas adjoining LAC, U-bend
of Indus River and Ladakh. In response to these festivities, the PLA soldiers
posted close to LAC displayed a red banner protesting the event.
Ever since animosities between China and the US
escalated, America has changed its position towards Tibet. In November 2020,
CTA head Lobsang was invited to the White House and in December 2020, US passed
Tibetan Policy and Support Act stating that Dalai Lama is the final authority on
his own reincarnation and succession and mooted establishment of US consulate
at Lhasa. Exercising firm control, China continues to restrict the movement of
foreign in Tibet. Expressing serious concerns over this legislation, US imposed
restrictions on Chinese visitors to America under the “reciprocal act of 2018”.
Trump administration’s support to Tibetan cause and the new act has riled up
China.
Tibet and India shared strong cultural, religious and
trade links and after its invasion in 1959, by offering refuge to the 14th
Dalai Lama and 17th Karmapa, India emerged the centre of Tibetan
Buddhism. India’s close links with Tibet is cause of heartburn for China which
believes that New Delhi can weaken its hold on Tibet. In 1965, China renamed
Tibet as Tibet Autonomous Region (TAR) and India recognized TAR as part of
China in 2003. The promise of autonomy was a myth. On the contrary, to
consolidate its power, China cracked down on any kind of revolt with heavy hand.
After Mao’s death, China attempted to make some amends
to its Tibetan policy and initiated negotiations. Between 2002 to 2010 the
Dalai Lama representatives and China’s United Work Front Department held ten
rounds of talks with a clause that everything except independence is
negotiable. But the talks collapsed and remained suspended.
China aspired to win over Tibet through development
and political re-education. Ushering Socialism in this region, Beijing wanted
to sinicise the Tibetan Buddhism. Believing that development would bring the
region closer to mainland, Beijing launched the Western Development Campaign
building new factories, roads, oil pipelines and necessary infrastructure. Under
the garb of poverty alleviation China voraciously exploited the mineral wealth
of the region and diverted waters from this water fount by building 11 dams and
caused irreparable environmental degradation.
China’s development agenda for Tibet failed to cut
ice. Coinciding with Beijing Olympics 2008, Tibetans revolted against the
mainland. As a mark of support widespread protests for autonomy were carried
out in Tibet, India, Nepal. In the next couple of years hundreds of Tibetans
monks performed self-immolation opposing China’s control.
Though this uprising and China’s efforts to deracinate
Tibetans failed to garner much attention as the Uighur detentions, post Tibetan
revolt, China has hardened its stance. Under the Chairmanship of Xi, China
denounced the Middle Way approach of Dalai Lama deemed it as splittism. Beijing
categorically warned that the Dalai Lama should abandon the stance of
independence and publicly announce that “Tibet has been integral part of
China since antiquity”.
As a frontier region, Tibet is at the heart of China’s
expansionist tool kit. Tibetan security is extremely pivotal for China’s India
policy. Hence, signalling strong disapproval to Modi’s telephonic conversation
with Dalai Lama, Xi visited Nyinchi in Tibet bordering Arunachal Pradesh on
July 21-22. The last Chinese President to visit Tibet was Jiang Zemin in 1990. Xi
last visited Tibet as vice-president a decade ago.
This visit which remained a state secret until video
appeared on the social media Weibo, had glimpses of Xi receiving a warm welcome
in Tibet. Accompanied by Zhou Youxia, vice-chairman of Central Military
Commission and in charge of the peripheral regions, Claude
Arpi writes Xi interacted with military commanders and soldiers stationed in
Tibet. Xi visited the Nying River Bridge in Yarlung Tsangpo River
Basin (Brahmaputra in India) and Nyang River its tributary. In November 2020,
China announced the construction of dams along the Yarlung River to use the
waters as a strategic weapon against India.
The downstream North Eastern region of India is
extremely vulnerable to flooding from overflows of Yarlung river. Much against
the warnings of building series of hydroelectric dams in this earthquake prone
region which can put entire region in risk and cause environmental degradation
China is going ahead with this project to threaten India.
During his visit, Xi was seen interacting with locals
in Shaliuhe township, Bakhor, Bayi headquarters of security forces and intentionally
rode back to Lhasa in the recently unveiled train to Nyngchi. Xi’s visit to the
region is orchestrated demonstrate Tibetan acceptability of Han rule and to
assert China’s complete control over the region.
Undoubtedly, Xi’s visit coming days after Modi’s
telephone call to Dalai Lama and ahead of the US deputy secretary of state
Wendy Sherman’s visit to Tianjin for talks is an overt warning to India and the
US.
Above all, Xi’s Nyngchi visit unequivocally
demonstrated China’s hardened stance and a default prolonged stalemate in
Indo-China talks over restoration of status quo ante. Perhaps, it might also be
China’s way of hinting India of opening yet another front along the Arunachal
border. Intending to put India in place, China stealthily intruded LAC. But
shocked by India’s vigorous military response quick force deployment, China quickly
ramped up defences and unwittingly entered a point of no return where an
attempt to pull back will be deemed timorous.
With his pompous border visit, Xi has provoked India
and foreclosed all attempts to backdown. By dictating terms and outlining
demands for engagement at Tianjin, China has inexorably miffed US. Paying back
in its own coin, US Secretary for State, Anthony Blinken on his India visit,
met the representative of CTA, Ngodup Dongchung.
China for long rued Indo-US strategic convergence.
Xi’s Tibet trip and antagonistic posturing besides exemplifying its muscular
revisionism has invariably ignited the “great-power competition” and paving way
for deepening of Indo-US partnership and strategic cooperation.
@ Copyrights reserved.
No comments:
Post a Comment