Since
August 5th Pakistan has been trying every possible trick to
internationalise revocation of special status to Kashmir an “internal matter”
of India. It marshalled diplomatic corps, pro-Pakistan media agencies, the
Diaspora to internationalise the issue and gave a free hand to its strategic
assets to stir insurgency in the Kashmir valley. Pakistani leaders gave calls
for jihad openly. But all its insidious attempts earned it isolation, embarrassment
and censure. Needless to say, Pakistan is losing international credibility.
Confirming this view, Pakistani interior Minister Brigadier Ijaz Ahmed Shah in
an interview admitted, “The World believes India, not Pakistan”.
After the
international alienation and a muted response from Arab World, Pakistan sought
to revamp its foreign policy. Pakistani military establishment which keeps a
tight leash on its media allowed journalists to discuss the possibilities of
establishing diplomatic ties with Israel. Giving voice to the speculations of
changes in foreign policy, an influential Pakistani journalist Kamran Khan on
Aug 25th tweeted, “High time Pakistan counters nefarious Indian
designs with bold foreign policy moves. Our deepest friends making fresh
alignments. No permanent friends no enemies. Why can’t we openly debate pros
cons of opening direct and overt channels of communication with the state of
Israel”. As anticipated the tweet triggered a debate on social media. The
message has been an attempt to reshape the opinion of Pakistani public who were
fed with generous doses of anti-Semitism. In fact, Pakistani mosques regularly
hold sermons and prayers calling for destruction of Israel.
Paradigm
shift in Islamabad’s diplomacy has in reckoning for some time. Last year
October, there was a buzz about an Israeli flight landing in Islamabad.
Pakistan quickly dismissed this report and rejected any plans of secret talks
between both countries. The event came to light after an Israeli journalist
tweeted about emergency landing of an Israeli flight traveling enroute Amman to
Islamabad. Around the same time, Pakistan’s lone Jew urged government to permit
him to travel to Jerusalem on pilgrimage. Pakistani passport holders can travel
to any country without any hitch but disallowed to visit Israel. Interestingly,
by January 2019, Pakistan government granted him permission to visit Jerusalem.
This clearly reflected Pakistan’s softening of stance towards Israel. The
gradual levitation of the Muslim World towards Israel in recent times together
with stable diplomatic relations established by Egypt and Jordan promoted
Pakistan to recalibrate its Israeli policy. Besides, India’s precise surgical
airstrikes on Balakot terror camps with the Israeli Spice-2000 bombs triggered
Islamabad’s interest in Israel who believed, “(Modi) Hindutva Zionists are
the attack dogs but their real handlers sit in Tel Aviv”.
Since its
inception, Pakistan considered formal diplomatic ties with Israel a taboo. Also
unstinted support to Palestine and remained sympathetic to its movement. This
came in the way of cultivating ties with the Jewish state. Islamabad never lost
an opportunity drawing parallels between India and Israel and portraying them
as aggressors occupying territories. While Pakistan and Israel stand as tall
examples of nation states carved out of religious nationalism, Pakistan opposed
Israel at UNGA in October 1947. In sharp contrast, Israeli Prime Minister David
Ben Gurion sent a telegram to Mohammed Ali Jinnah after Declaration of
Independence. But Pakistan didn’t respond. Pakistan backed OIC (Organisation of
Islamic Cooperation) formed in 1969 that opposed Israel and in the Arab-Israeli
wars in 1967 and 1973.
At times
Pakistan took balancing position towards Israel. In 1979 when Egypt was
expelled from OIC for its diplomatic relations with Israel, Pakistan
facilitated its re-admission into the group. Reportedly, in 1980s Pakistan’s
Inter State Intelligence (ISI) and Israeli Intelligence Agency Mossad worked
together in CIA led-operations against the Soviet Union in Afghanistan.
Paradoxically, while it encouraged people to join Palestine Liberation
Organisation (PLO) to fight against Israel, it asked PLO to recognise Israel in
1986. Post Oslo Accord when Israel pulled out of Gaza strip in 1993, it is
believed that Pakistan mulled establishing ties with Israel. Pakistan’s
realistic approach on Israel was spurred by India’s decision of establishing
official ties with Jerusalem in 1992.
Pakistan
which is a bunch of contradictions shifted its positions constantly. In 1994,
Pakistani Prime Minister Benazir Bhutto reportedly cancelled her visit to Gaza
to avoid any coordination with Israeli officials. While officials confirm that
Pakistani and Israeli officials held secret talks earlier, it was only in 2003
President Pervez Musharraf openly advocated for diplomatic talks with Israel.
In 2005 for the first time Pakistani Foreign Minister Khursheed Kasuri shook
hands with his Israeli counterpart Silvan Shalom at Ankara. But this breakthrough
failed to produce a thaw in the traditional hostility of Pakistan. Islamists
who wield political clout opposed Pakistan’s foreign policy towards Israel. Military
establishment steeped in Islamic culture was against opening up official
communication with Israel. Successors of Musharraf, puny puppets of the establishment
had no stomach for recalibrating Pakistan’s Israeli policy.
Pakistan’s
rejuvenated interest in Israel stems from the latter’s increased acceptance and
waning of global interest in Palestine. For all its discrepancies International
community embroiled with other disputes gave cold shoulder to Palestine
movement. Burgeoning hostilities between the Sunni bloc and Iran brought them
even closer to Israel which fights Tehran’s terrorism tooth and nail. UAE,
Bahrain, Oman, Saudi Arabia which are seeking cooperation and intelligence sharing
to take in Iran are making no secret of their ties with Israel. Last year,
Israeli Prime Minister made an official visit to Oman. UAE hosted Israeli
officials. Crown Prince in an interview welcomed America’s decision of shifting
embassy to Jerusalem. Bahrain’s foreign minister Khalid bin Ahmed al Khalif
defended Israeli air strikes against Iran in Syria. Arab elites are warming up
to Israel. Central Asian Muslim countries are cultivating ties with Israel. A
majority of Latin American countries have forged ties with Israel. Diplomatic
ties with Israel are no longer kosher.
Recent reports even talk of Saudi plans of setting up embassy in
Jerusalem lending more credence to Israeli claims to the historical city.
Normalisation of ties with Israel is now order of the day. Above all, India’s
growing conventional weapons superiority and the acquisition of advanced
technologies denied by the US from Israel serves as a compelling case for
Pakistan to open diplomatic channels of communication with Israel.
Pakistan realises
the importance of staying in good books of the US to be strategically relevant.
By cultivating ties with Israel Pakistan can influence the powerful lobby of US
Jews, who tow an anti-Pakistani stand. Pakistan will also stand to gain from military
ties with Israel. But given Pakistan’s crippling economic crisis and
international reputation of being the “the most dangerous of all the
countries” as enunciated by the US former defence secretary Jim Mattis in
his new book Call Sign Chaos: Learning to Lead, Pakistan may not be an
interesting bet for Israel. While there is perception that ties with Pakistan
can be beneficial in dealing with Iran, Islamabad is duplicitous and can’t be trusted.
Pakistan adopts a cautions approach towards Iran. In 2015 it turned down Saudi
request to join troops in Yemen. Also, both Pakistan and Iran have common
interests in Baluchistan and aspire to have an influence in Afghanistan. Pakistan
which relies on Iran for concessionary oil may be averse to be on a collision
course with its Western neighbour. Pakistan is full of paradoxes. This makes it
an untrustworthy friend.
But a
recognition by Pakistan will enhance Israel’s legitimacy. Israel will respond
positively respond to Pakistan’s overtures. Overt diplomatic communications
with any Muslim country big or small can erode religious dissensions. Israel
which is keen on normalising ties with all countries might welcome any friendly
call.
Islamabad
always depicted Israel as an imperialist state. At a time when Pakistan made
fight for Kashmir its survival issue getting public acceptance for ties with
Israel who supplied weapons to India for Balakot strikes will be a nightmare.
In 2002, overriding popular sentiments Pakistani tennis player Aisam-ul-Haq
Qureshi partnered with Israeli Amir Hadad at Wimbledon and reached third round.
This created a stir in Pakistan which even out blackouts Israel players in
Olympics. For decades, Pakistan churned out conspiracy theories about Israel. It
will be difficult to overcome Islamic resistance. For all the debated in
political circles on formal ties with Israel, the current political
dispensation which lacks credibility, astuteness and relevance can hardly
muster courage to take any iconic step in that direction. India which enjoys a robust
strategic partnership with Israel shouldn’t lose sleep over the current
discourse.
@ Copyrights reserved.
No comments:
Post a Comment